ANALYSIS OF RESOURCE UTILIZATION EFFICIENCY IN OILY SUNFLOWER (Helianthus Annuus, L.) PRODUCTION: THE CASE OF ÇANAKKALE PROVINCE
Resource Use Efficiency in Oily Sunflower Production
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10488537Abstract
Türkiye is one of the world's major sunflower producer countries. According to FAO data of 2021, Turkey had a share of 3.05% in sunflower production area in the world and 4.15% in sunflower production. The aim of this study was to determine the resource utilization efficiency of the factors used in sunflower production in Çanakkale province, which is located in the Marmara Region of Turkey. The data used in the research were obtained through a questionnaire from 75 agricultural enterprises determined by the "stratified sampling method". The coefficient of determination (R2) of the equation for sunflower production was 0.885, and the F value (182.78) was significant at the level of 1%. The sum of the elasticity coefficients of the variables in the estimation equation (∑βi) was calculated as 1.048 which indicates an increasing return to scale in sunflower production. The DW statistic for the equation was 1.878, and no autocorrelation was found between the variables. When the production elasticity coefficients of the independent variables in the equation were examined; it was determined that the elasticity coefficients of the seed amount and fertilizer amount were positive, and the agricultural pesticide amount was negative. The elasticity coefficient of the fertilizer factor was 5%, and the coefficient of the seed factor was significant at the 6% probability level. Considering the overall enterprise, according to the marginal efficiency coefficients; it was understood that seed and pesticide inputs (0.01) were used excessively in sunflower production, while fertilizer input (12.90) was used below the optimum level. The coefficients obtained within the research revealed that the amount of fertilizer should be increased and the amount of seeds should be decreased. According to the research results, the marginal efficiency coefficient of the factor components related to the use of fertilizer and seed was found as 0.832. This value showed that the fertilizer factor was used less than the seed factor and should be increased. Within the study; it was revealed that the resources were not used effectively in sunflower production, and this situation has a negative effect on the producer's income. In order to make sunflower production profitable, each input must produce at the point where the marginal product value is either equal or equal to its marginal cost.
References
Aydın B (2014). Trakya Bölgesinde faaliyet gösteren tarım işletmelerinin yapısal özellikleri ve etkinliklerinin belirlenmesi. Namık Kemal Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Tarım Ekonomisi Anabilim Dalı. Doktora Tezi. 138 s. Tekirdağ.
Dalchiavon FC; Lorenzon LA; Perina RA; Oliveira RA; Santos JA (2019). Economic opportunity for investment in soybean and sunflower crop system in Mato Grosso, Brazil. Journal of Experimental Agriculture International, 29 (5): 1-12 (Article no.JEAI.45695).
Dawson PJ; Lingard J (1982). Management bias and returns to scale in a Cobb-Douglas production function for agriculture. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 9(1): 7-24.
Düğmeci H; Çelik Y (2020). Konya İli Çumra İlçesinde Yağlık Ayçiçeği Üretim Maliyetinin Tespiti Üzerine Bir Araştırma. Türk Tarım ve Doğa Bilimleri Dergisi, 7(3):682-690.
FAO (2022). Birleşmiş Milletler Gıda ve Tarım Örgütü. FAOSTAT. Erişim: http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data [Erişim tarihi: 20.05.2022]
Gujarati DN; Porter D (2014). Temel Ekonometri. Literatür Yayıncılık. (5.Basımdan Çeviri). 915 s., İstanbul, Türkiye.
Gül V; Öztürk E; Polat T (2016). Günümüz Türkiye’sinde Bitkisel Yağ Açığını Kapatmada Ayçiçeğinin Önemi. Alınteri Zirai Bilimler Dergisi, 30 (1): 70-76.
Gündoğmuş E (1998). Ankara ili Akyurt ilçesi tarım işletmelerinde ekmeklik buğday (Triticum aestivum L.) üretiminin fonksiyonel analizi ve üretim maliyetinin hesaplanması. Tr. J. of Agriculture and Forestry, 22 (1998) 251-260.
Heady OE; Dillon JL (1961). Agricultural Production Functions. Iowa State Universty Press, 667 p. Ames, Iowa, USA.
Heady OE; Dillon JL (1966). Agricultural Production Functions. Iown State University Press. USA.
Irugu SD; Suhasini K; Prabhakar BN (2017). Resource use efficiency of sunflower in Kurnool district of Andhra Pradesh. Research Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 8(1): 91-94.
Karagölge C (1973). Arazi Tasarruf Şekillerine Göre Erzurum İlindeki Tarım İşletmelerinin Ekonometrik Analizi. Ankara Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Yayınları: Ankara.
Karkacıer O (2001). Tarım Ekonomisi alanına ilişkin fonksiyonel analizler ve bu analizlerden çıkartılabilecek bazı kantitatif bulgular. Gaziosmanpaşa Üniversitesi, Ziraat Fakültesi Yayınları No:49, Ders Notları Serisi No:26, 73 s., Tokat.
Khatun M; Hossain TM; Miah MM; Khandoker S; Rashid M (2016). Profitability of sunflower cultivation in some selected sites of Bangladesh. Bangladesh Journal of Agricultural Research, 41(4): 599–623.
Kumar, M., Malik, D.P., Singh, A., Kumar, A. Economic Analysis and Resource use Efficiency of Sunflower Cultivation in Haryana. Indian Journal of Ecology (2023) 50(5) (SI): 1812-1815.
Külekçi M (2010). Technical efficiency analysis for oilseed sunflower farms: a case study in Erzurum, Turkey. J Sci Food Agric, 90: 1508–1512.
Mobtaker HG; Keyhani A; Mohammadi A; Rafiee S; Akram A (2010). Sensitivityanalysis of energy inputs for barley production in Hamedan Province of Iran. Agric Ecosyst Environ, 137(3-4):367- 372.
Mousavi-Avval SH; Rafiee S; Jafari A; Mohammadi A (2011). Econometric modeling and sensitivity analysis of costs of inputs for sunflower production in Iran. International Journal of Applied Engineering Research, 1(4):759-766.
Nategh NA; Banaeian N; Gholamshahi A; Nosrati M (2020). Optimization of energy, economic, and environmental indices in sunflower cultivation: A comparative analysis. Environ. Prog. & Sustainable Energy. 2020e13505. (https://doi.org/10.1002/ep.13505).
Neill RJ (2002). Production and production functions: some implications of a refinement to process analysis. Journal of Economic Behaviour & Organization. 51(4):507-521.
Oguz C; Altıntaş O (2002). Cost and functional analysis of sunflower production for nut and oil in Kırıkkale province. Selcuk J. Agri. Food Sci., 16:39-47.
Oğuz C; Karakayacı Z (2017). Tarım Ekonomisinde Araştırma ve Örnekleme Metodolojisi. Atlas Akademi Yayınları 183 s. Konya.
Özçelik A (1989). Ankara Şeker Fabrikası civarındaki seker pancarı yetiştiren tarım işletmelerinde şeker pancarı ile buğday için fiziki üretim girdileri ve üretimin fonksiyonel Analizi A.Ü. Ziraat Fakültesi Yayın No:1113, Bilimsel Araştırma ve İncelemeler, 53 s., Ankara.
Rafiee S; Mousavi-Avval SH; Mohammadi A (2010). Modeling and sensitivity analysis of energy inputs for apple production in Iran. Energy, 35(8): 3301- 3306.
Resmi Gazete, 2023a. Cumhurbaşkanlığı Kararı.“2023 Yılında Yapılacak Tarımsal Desteklemeler ve 2024 Yılında Uygulanacak Sertifikalı Tohum Kullanım Desteğine İlişkin Karar”. Resmi Gazete Tarih: 15.09.2023, Sayı: 32310.
Resmi Gazete, 2023b. Tarım ve Orman Bakanlığı. “Bitkisel Üretime Destekleme Ödemesi Yapılmasına Dair Tebliğ (Tebliğ No: 2023/46)”. Resmi Gazete Tarih: 26.11.2023, Sayı: 32381.
Semerci A (1998). The agricultural structure in Thrace region and the productivity analysis of the major agricultural products. PhD Thesis, Trakya University, Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences, Department of Agricultural Economics, 249 p. Edirne.
Semerci A (2012a). Productivity analysis of sunflower cultivations in Turkey. Bulg. J. Agric. Sci., 18(6): 873-882.
Semerci A (2012b). Productivity analysis of sunflower production in Turkey. Pak. J. Agri. Sci., 49 (4): 577-582.
Semerci A (2013). Functional analysis of sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) production in Turkey: A case study of Thrace region. Journal of Food, Agriculture & Environment, 11(1): 436 – 440.
Semerci A (2022a). Tarımsal üretimde kaynak kullanım etkinliğinin belirlenmesi: Yağlık ayçiçeği (Helianthus annuus, L.) üretimi örneği. Türk Tarım ve Doğa Bilimleri Dergisi, 9(2): 263–281.
Semerci A (2022b). Yağlık ayçiçeği (Helianthus annuus, L.) üretiminde işletme büyüklük gruplarına göre girdi kullanım etkinliğinin analizi. Türk Tarım ve Doğa Bilimleri Dergisi, 9(2): 227–243.
Semerci A; Kaya Y; Durak S (2007). Economic analysis of sunflower production in Turkey. Helia, 30(47): 105-114.
Semerci A; Durmuş E (2021). Türkiye’de yağlık ayçiçeği üretiminin analizi. Turkish Journal of Agriculture - Food Science And Technology, 9(1): 56-62.
Semerci A; Süzer S (2006). Trakya’da ayçiçeği üreten işletmelerde girdi kullanımı ve destekleme politikalarının etkinliğinin belirlenmesi. (Proje No: Tagem/Ta/05/02/01/002). Trakya Tarımsal Araştırma Enstitüsü. (Proje sonuç raporu). 113 p. Edirne.
Singh G; Singh S; Singh J (2004). Optimization of energy inputs for wheat crop in Punjab. Energy Conversion and Management, 45 (3): 453-465.
Sonawane KG; Pokharkar VG; Nirgude RR (2019). Sunflower production technology: An economic analysis. Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry, 8(3): 2378-2382.
Şahin İ; Semerci A; Kaya Y; Çıtak N (2010). Ayçiçeği tarımında verimlilik ve destekleme politikalarının etkinliğinin belirlenmesi. Tarım ve Köyişleri Bakanlığı. Tarımsal Araştırmalar Genel Müdürlüğü. AR-GE Projesi Sonuç Raporu (TAGEM 08/AR-GE/6). 354 s. Edirne.
TOB (2020). Çanakkale İl Tarım ve Orman Müdürlüğü. 2020 Çiftçi Kayıt Sistemi Verileri.
Unakıtan G; Aydın BA (2018). Comparison of energy use efficiency and economic analysis of wheat and sunflower production in Turkey: A case study in Thrace Region. Energy, 149: 279-285.
Yamane T (1967). Elementary Sampling Theory. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice- Hall, Inc., 405 pp. USA.
Yüksek E (2019). Adana ilinde yağlık ayçiçeği üretim faaliyetinin ekonomik analizi. Yüksek Lisans Tezi. Kahramanmaraş Üniversitesi Lisansüstü Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Tarım Ekonomisi Anabilim Dalı, 50 s. Kahramanmaraş.
Zoral YK (1973). Cobb-Douglas üretim fonksiyonunun Yukarı Pasinler Ovasındaki patates üretimine uygulanması. Atatürk Üniversitesi Yayınları: Ankara.
Zoral YK (1984). Üretim Fonksiyonları, Dokuz Eylül Ü. Müh. Mim. Fakültesi, MM/END-84 EY 052, İzmir.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 EJONS INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.