Cluster Analysis of Occupational Health and Safety (OHS) Data: A Study Based on Occupational Groups

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18274120

Keywords:

Work Accidents And Diseases, Cluster Analysis, SGK Statistical Yearbook, Occupational Health And Safety

Abstract

The aim of this study is to analyze work accident and occupational disease data in Türkiye for the period 2020–2024 using the cluster analysis method. The dataset was obtained from the statistical yearbooks of the Social Security Institution (SGK) and includes 88 occupational groups. Before analysis, the data were standardized, and the rates of work accidents and occupational diseases were evaluated separately. Hierarchical cluster analysis was performed using Ward’s method, revealing that occupational groups were classified according to their similarity levels. As a result, the work accident data formed three clusters, consisting of 41 low, 28 medium, and 19 high-risk occupational groups. For occupational diseases, four clusters were obtained, and the total number of reported cases increased by 27% between 2020 and 2024. The findings indicate that risk intensity is particularly concentrated in sectors such as manufacturing, construction, and mining. This study provides a data-driven framework to support targeted and prioritized occupational health and safety policies.

References

Cooper, M.D., 2000. Towards a model of safety culture. Safety Science, 36(2): 111–136.

Cox, S., Flin, R., 1998. Safety culture: Philosopher’s stone or man of straw? Work and Stress, 12(3): 189–201.

ÇSGB, 2025. T.C. Çalışma ve Sosyal Güvenlik Bakanlığı | Duyurular. (https://www.csgb.gov.tr/sgb/duyurular/2023-yili-faaliyet-raporu/), (Erişim Tarihi: 22.11.2025).

Demirbilek Tunç, 2005. İş Güvenliği Kültürü. (https://legal.com.tr/urun/is-guvenligi-kulturu/4417), (Erişim Tarihi: 22.11.2025).

Dizdar, E.N., Koçar, O., 2018. İş sağlığı ve güvenliği yönetim sistemlerinde risklerin yapay sinir ağlarıyla değerlendirilmesi. Academic Platform-Journal of Engineering and Science, 6(3): 73-83.

Dizdar, E.N., Koçar, O., 2024. Artificial neural network-based risk assessment for occupational accidents in the shipbuilding industry in Turkey. Neural Computing and Applications, 36(32): 20457–20471.

Dizdar, E.N., Ünver, M., 2020. The assessment of occupational safety and health in Turkey by applying a decision-making method; MULTIMOORA. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment, 26(6): 1693–1704.

Hale, A.R., Hovden, J., 1998. Management and culture: the third age of safety. A review of approaches to organizational aspects of safety, health and environment. Occupational Injury, 145-182.

Hämäläinen, P., Takala, J., Saarela, K.L., 2006. Global estimates of occupational accidents. Safety Science, 44(2): 137–156.

Karacan, E., Erdoğan, Ö.N., 2011. İşçi sağlığı ve iş güvenliğine insan kaynakları yönetimi fonksiyonları açısından çözümsel bir yaklaşım. Kocaeli Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, (21): 102-117.

Neal, A., Griffin, M.A., 2002. Safety climate and safety behaviour. Australian Journal of Management, 27: 67–75.

Park, M.Y. Kang, M.Y., 2025. Occupational risk factors for kidney disease: A comprehensive review. Journal of Korean Medical Science, 40(31): e224.

Reason, J., 2016. Managing the risks of organizational accidents. Managing the Risks of Organizational Accidents, 1–252.

SGK, 2025. Sosyal Güvenlik Kurumu. (https://www.sgk.gov.tr/Istatistik/Yillik/fcd5e59b-6af9-4d90-a451-ee7500eb1cb4), (Erişim Tarihi: 22.11.2025).

Published

2026-03-31

How to Cite

ÜNVER, M. ., & ALSHEHABAT, H. (2026). Cluster Analysis of Occupational Health and Safety (OHS) Data: A Study Based on Occupational Groups. Ejons International Journal on Mathematic, Engineering and Natural Sciences, 10(1), 17–30. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18274120

Issue

Section

Articles