Öğretmen adaylarının Ters Fonksiyonlara İlişkin Enstrümanlı Eylem Şemalarının İncelenmesi
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17948158Anahtar Kelimeler:
Enstrümantal yaklaşım, öğretmen adayları, teknoloji destekli öğretim, temsiller, enstrümanlı eylem şemalarÖzet
Bu çalışma, öğretmen adaylarının ters fonksiyonları temsil süreçlerini ve bu süreçlerde ortaya çıkan enstrümantal oluşumlarını incelemeyi amaçlamaktadır. Bu kapsamda, kağıt-kalem ve dinamik geometri ortamlarında ters fonksiyonların yazımı ve grafiklerinin çizimine yönelik geliştirilen enstrümanlı eylem şemalarına odaklanarak, öğretmen adaylarının matematik öğretimine yönelik teknolojik araçların öğretim sürecindeki katkısı değerlendirilmiştir. Araştırma, Türkiye’de bir devlet üniversitesinde ilköğretim matematik öğretmenliği programının ikinci sınıfında öğrenim gören 6 öğretmen adayı ile yürütülmüştür. Araştırmanın verileri çalışma yaprağı, yazılı ve sözlü görüşmeler, ekran ve ses kayıtları ile toplanmış ve içerik analizi yöntemiyle çözümlenmiştir. Veriler kodlanmış, kategorilere ayrılmış ve enstrümantal yaklaşımın bileşenleri çatısında temalar oluşturulmuş ve araştırmanın amacı doğrultusunda yorumlanmıştır. Araştırmanın sonucunda, öğretmen adaylarının kâğıt-kalem ortamında geliştirdikleri enstrümanlı eylem şemalarının işlemsel düzeyde kaldığını, Cabri-Geometri ortamında ise kavramsal, etkileşimli ve çoklu temsilli şemalar geliştirdiğini ortaya konulmuştur. Dinamik ortamın görsel ve etkileşimli özellikleri, öğretmen adaylarının cebirsel kavramları anlamlandırma ve temsiller arası geçişlerini kolaylaştırarak, teknoloji entegrasyonunun matematik öğretiminde kavramsal öğrenmeyi destekleyici bir yaklaşım olarak benimsenmesi gerektiğini göstermektedir.
Referanslar
Ainsworth, S., 1999. The functions of multiple representations. Computers ve Education, 33(2–3): 131–152.
Baccaglini-Frank, A., Antonini, S., 2016. From conjecture generation by maintaining dragging to proof. Arxiv Preprint Arxiv, 1605.02583.
Barabash, M., 2019. Dragging as a geometric construction tool: Continuity considerations inspired by students’ attempts. Digital Experiences in Mathematics Education, 5(2): 124–144.
Bokhove, C., Drijvers, P., 2012. Effects of a digital intervention on the development of algebraic expertise. Computers ve Education, 58(1): 197–208.
Cresswell, J., 2013. Qualitative inquiry ve research design: Choosing among five approaches. SAGE.
Dede, Y., Argün, Z., 2003. Cebir, öğrencilere niçin zor gelmektedir? Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 24: 180–185.
Dreyfus, T., Tsamir, P., 2004. Ben’s consolidation of knowledge structures about infinite sets. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 23(3): 271–300.
Dreyfus, T., Hershkowitz, R., Schwarz, B., 2015. The nested epistemic actions model for abstraction in context: Theory as methodological tool and methodological tool as theory. In A. Bikner-Ahsbahs, C. Knipping, ve N. Presmeg (Eds.), Approaches to qualitative research in mathematics education: Examples of methodology and methods. Springer, pp. 185–217.
Drijvers, P., 2019. Embodied instrumentation: Combining different views on using digital technology in mathematics education. In Eleventh Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education (No. 1). Freudenthal Group; Freudenthal Institute; ERME.
Drijvers, P., Sinclair, N., 2024. The role of digital technologies in mathematics education: Purposes and perspectives. ZDM–Mathematics Education, 56(2): 239–248.
Drijvers, P., Trouche, L., 2008. From artifacts to instruments: A theoretical framework behind the orchestra metaphor. In G. W. Blume ve M. K. Heid (Eds.), Research on technology and the teaching and learning of mathematics: Cases and perspectives. Information Age Publishing, pp. 363–392.
Eisenberg, T. Dreyfus, T., 1991. On the reluctance to visualize in mathematics. In W. Zimmermann ve S. Cunningham (Eds.), Visualization in teaching and learning mathematics. Mathematical Association of America, pp. 25–37.
Engelhardt, P.V., Corpuz, E.G., Ozimek, D.J., Rebello, N.S., 2004. The teaching experiment—What it is and what it isn’t. AIP Conference Proceedings, American Institute of Physics, pp. 157–160.
Fitrianna, A.Y., Rosjanuardi, R., Prabawanto, S., 2024. Algebraic reasoning of high school students in solving inverse function problems: Viewed from mathematical resilience. Indonesian Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 7(2): 322–336.
Frankel, R. M., Devers, K.J., 2000. Study design in qualitative research-1: Developing questions and assessing resource needs. Education for Health, 13(2): 251–261.
Haspekian, M., 2005. An “instrumental approach” to study the integration of a computer tool into mathematics teaching: The case of spreadsheets. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 10(2): 109–141.
Janvier, C.E., 1987. Problems of representation in the teaching and learning of mathematics. In C. Janvier (Ed.), Problems of representation in the teaching and learning of mathematics, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 1–9.
Kaput, J.J., 1998. Representations, inscriptions, descriptions and learning: A kaleidoscope of windows. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 17(2): 265–281.
Kieran, C., 1992. The learning and teaching of school algebra. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning. Macmillan Publishing Company, pp. 390–419.
Kieran, C., Drijvers, P., 2006. The co-emergence of machine techniques, paper-and-pencil techniques, and theoretical reflection: A study of CAS use in secondary school algebra. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 11: 205–263.
Komatsu, K., Jones, K., 2020. Interplay between paper-and-pencil activity and dynamic-geometry-environment use during generalisation and proving. Digital Experiences in Mathematics Education, 6(2): 123–143.
Laborde, C., 2002. Integration of technology in the design of geometry tasks with Cabri-Geometry. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 6: 283–317.
MacGregor, M., Stacey, K., 1993. Cognitive models underlying students’ formulation of simple linear equations. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 24(3): 217–232.
Mariotti, M.A., 2000. Introduction to proof: The mediation of a dynamic software environment. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 44(1): 25–53.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, 2000. Principles and standards for school mathematics.
Ndlovu, M., Wessels, D., De Villiers, M., 2011. An instrumental approach to modelling the derivative in Sketchpad. Pythagoras, 32(2): 1–15.
Nolasco, J., 2018. The struggle with inverse functions doing and undoing process. Master’s Thesis, California State University, San Bernardino.
Öcal, M.F., Kar, T., Güler, G., İpek, A.S., 2020. Comparison of prospective mathematics teachers’ problem posing abilities in paper-pencil test and on dynamic geometry environment in terms of creativity. Journal of Research in Mathematics Education, 9(3): 243–272.
Paoletti, T., Stevens, I.E., Hobson, N.L., Moore, KC., LaForest, K.R., 2018. Inverse function: Pre-service teachers’ techniques and meanings. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 97(1): 93–109.
Pittalis, M., Drijvers, P., 2023. Embodied instrumentation in a dynamic geometry environment: Eleven-year-old students’ dragging schemes. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 113(2): 181–205.
Segal, R., Oxman, V., Stupel, M., 2021. Using dynamic geometry software to enhance specialized content knowledge: Pre-service mathematics teachers’ perceptions. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 16(3): em0647.
Song, Y.,2021. A review of how class orchestration with technology has been conducted for pedagogical practices. Educational Technology Research and Development, 69(3): 1477–1503.
Steffe, L.P., Ulrich, C., 2014. Constructivist teaching experiment. In S. Lerman (Ed.), Encyclopedia of mathematics education. Springer, pp. 102–109.
Tall, D., Gray, E., Ali, M.B., Crowley, L., DeMarois, P., McGowen, M., ... ve Yusof, Y., 2001. Symbols and the bifurcation between procedural and conceptual thinking. Canadian Journal of Math, Science ve Technology Education, 1(1): 81–104.
Tapan, M.S., 2006. Différents types de savoirs mis en œuvre dans la formation initiale d’enseignants de mathématiques à l’intégration de technologies de géométrie dynamique. Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi, Université Joseph-Fourier – Grenoble I.
Taşlıbeyaz, E., 2010. Ortaöğretim öğrencilerinin bilgisayar destekli matematik öğretiminde matematik algılarına yönelik durum çalışması: Lise 3. sınıf uygulaması. Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Atatürk Üniversitesi.
Trouche, L., 2004. Managing the complexity of human/machine interactions in computerized learning environments: Guiding students’ command process through instrumental orchestrations. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 9(3): 281–307.
Trouche, L., 2005. Instrumental genesis, individual and social aspects. In D. Guin, K. Ruthven, ve L. Trouche (Eds.), The didactical challenge of symbolic calculators: Turning a computational device into a mathematical instrument. Springer, pp. 197–230.
Verillon, P., Rabardel, P., 1995. Cognition and artifacts: A contribution to the study of thought in relation to instrumented activity. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 10(1): 77–101.
Xu, C., 2025. Improving mathematical skills of mathematics education students through integrated use of graphing software and programming techniques. International Journal of Education and Humanities, 5(1): 277.
Yuhasriati, Y., Johar, R., Khairunnisak, C., Rohaizati, U., Zubaidah, T., 2022. Students’ mathematical representation ability in learning algebraic expression using realistic mathematics education. Jurnal Didaktik Matematika, 9(1): 151–165.
Zhang, Y., Wang, P., Jia, W., Zhang, A., Chen, G., 2025. Dynamic visualization by GeoGebra for mathematics learning: A meta-analysis of 20 years of research. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, (2): 437–458.
İndir
Yayınlanmış
Nasıl Atıf Yapılır
Sayı
Bölüm
Lisans
Telif Hakkı (c) 2025 EJONS Uluslararası Matematik, Mühendislik ve Doğa Bilimleri Dergisi

Bu çalışma Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License ile lisanslanmıştır.