EVALUATION OF THE EFFECTS OF SELF-LIGATING BRACKETS ON THE ORTHODONTIC TOOTH MOVEMENT
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8198887Anahtar Kelimeler:
Diş hareketi hızlandırma, Kanin distalizasyonu, Kendinden bağlamalı braket, Model tarama, SürtünmeÖzet
Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı kendinden bağlamalı bir braket (Gemini SL) ile konvansiyonel bir braket (Gemini) kullanılarak yapılan kanin distalizasyonunun miktarını ve diş hareketi üzerine olan etkisini karşılaştırmaktır.
Gereç ve Yöntem: Bu çalışmada premolar diş çekimi ile sabit ortodontik tedavi gereken bireylerden SLB grubu (18 birey) ve CONT grubu (15 birey) oluşturuldu. Seviyeleme ve sıralama tamamlandıktan sonra 0,019×0,025 inch paslanmaz çelik tel üzerinde 150 gr kuvvet uygulayan NiTi kapalı yaylar ile kanin distalizasyonu yapıldı. Model ve fotoğraf kayıtları distalizasyonun 1., 4. ve 8. haftalarında alındı. Elde edilen alçı modeller üç boyutlu model tarama cihazında tarandı. Kanin distalizasyonu, distopalatinal rotasyonu ve devrilmesi ile birlikte molar mesializasyonu ve çekim boşluklarının miktarı ölçüldü.
Bulgular: SLB ve CONT grubu kıyaslandığında üst çenede kanin distalizasyonu, distopalatinal rotasyonu, tippingi ve çekim boşluğu miktarları açısından istatistiksel olarak önemli bir farklılık bulunmamışken, molar mesializasyonunda anlamlı fark görülmüştür. Alt çenede üst çeneden farklı olarak kanin tipping değerlerinde anlamlı fark saptanmıştır.
Sonuç: Kendinden bağlamalı braketler ile konvansiyonel braketler arasında ortodontik diş hareketi hızı açısından istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir fark izlenmemiştir.
Referanslar
Tanne K, Matsubara S, Hotei Y, Sakuda M, Yoshida M. Frictional forces and surface topography of a new ceramic bracket. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 1994;106(3):273-8.
Proffit WR, Fields Jr HW, Sarver DM. Contemporary orthodontics: Elsevier Health Sciences; 2006.
Ho KS, West VC. Friction resistance between edgewise brackets and archwires. Australian orthodontic journal. 1991;12(2):95.
Keith O, Jones S, Davies E. The influence of bracket material, ligation force and wear on frictional resistance of orthodontic brackets. British journal of orthodontics. 1993;20(2):109-15.
Cacciafesta V, Sfondrini MF, Ricciardi A, Scribante A, Klersy C, Auricchio F. Evaluation of friction of stainless steel and esthetic self-ligating brackets in various bracket-archwire combinations. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 2003;124(4):395-402.
Oz AA, Arici N, Arici S. The clinical and laboratory effects of bracket type during canine distalization with sliding mechanics. The Angle Orthodontist. 2012;82(2):326-32.
Machibya FM, Bao X, Zhao L, Hu M. Treatment time, outcome, and anchorage loss comparisons of self-ligating and conventional brackets. The Angle Orthodontist. 2013;83(2):280-5.
Shah A. Self-ligating brackets: Past, Present, and Future of orthodontics. J Dent Sci.2(1):4-8.
Miles PG, Weyant RJ, Rustveld L. A clinical trial of Damon 2™ vs conventional twin brackets during initial alignment. The Angle Orthodontist. 2006;76(3):480-5.
Damon DH. The Damon low-friction bracket; a biologically compatible straight-wire system. J Clin Orthod. 1998;32:670-80.
Zreaqat M, Hassan R. Self-Ligating Brackets: An Overview. Principles in Contemporary Orthodontics. 2011;1.
Li S, Xia Z, Liu SS-Y, Eckert G, Chen J. Three-dimensional canine displacement patterns in response to translation and controlled tipping retraction strategies. The Angle Orthodontist. 2015;85(1):18-25.
Hoggan BR, Sadowsky C. The use of palatal rugae for the assessment of anteroposterior tooth movements. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 2001;119(5):482-8.
Hayashi K, Uechi J, Murata M, Mizoguchi I. Comparison of maxillary canine retraction with sliding mechanics and a retraction spring: a three-dimensional analysis based on a midpalatal orthodontic implant. The European Journal of Orthodontics. 2004;26(6):585-9.
Aksakalli S, Calik B, Kara B, Ezirganli S. Accelerated tooth movement with piezocision and its periodontal-transversal effects in patients with Class II malocclusion. The Angle Orthodontist. 2016;86(1):59-65.
Haliloglu-Ozkan T, Arici N, Arici S. In-vivo effects of flapless osteopuncture-facilitated tooth movement in the maxilla and the mandible. Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry. 2018;10(8):e761.
Shpack N, Davidovitch M, Sarne O, Panayi N, Vardimon AD. Duration and anchorage management of canine retraction with bodily versus tipping mechanics. The Angle Orthodontist. 2008;78(1):95-100.
Kiliaridis S, Lyka I, Friede H, Carlsson GE, Ahlqwist M. Vertical position, rotation, and tipping of molars without antagonists. International Journal of Prosthodontics. 2000;13(6).
Arash V, Rabiee M, Rakhshan V, Khorasani S, Sobouti F. In vitro evaluation of frictional forces of two ceramic orthodontic brackets versus a stainless steel bracket in combination with two types of archwires. Journal of orthodontic science. 2015;4(2):42.
Nishio C, da Motta AFJ, Elias CN, Mucha JN. In vitro evaluation of frictional forces between archwires and ceramic brackets. American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics. 2004;125(1):56-64.
Tecco S, Di Iorio D, Cordasco G, Verrocchi I, Festa F. An in vitro investigation of the influence of self-ligating brackets, low friction ligatures, and archwire on frictional resistance. The European Journal of Orthodontics. 2007;29(4):390-7.
Krishnan V, Davidovitch Ze. Cellular, molecular, and tissue-level reactions to orthodontic force. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 2006;129(4):469. e1-. e32.
Burrow SJ. Canine retraction rate with self-ligating brackets vs conventional edgewise brackets. The Angle Orthodontist. 2010;80(4):626-33.
Turnbull NR, Birnie DJ. Treatment efficiency of conventional vs self-ligating brackets: effects of archwire size and material. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 2007;131(3):395-9.
BAKER RW, GUAY AH, PETERSON JR HW. Current concepts of anchorage management. The Angle Orthodontist. 1972;42(2):129-38.
Tosun Y. Sabit ortodontik apareylerin biyomekanik prensipleri. İzmir: Ege Üniversitesi Basımevi. 1999:6-7.
Keles A, Erverdi N, Sezen S. Bodily distalization of molars with absolute anchorage. The Angle Orthodontist. 2003;73(4):471-82.
Umemori M, Sugawara J, Mitani H, Nagasaka H, Kawamura H. Skeletal anchorage system for open-bite correction. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 1999;115(2):166-74.
da Costa Monini A, Júnior LGG, Vianna AP, Martins RP. A comparison of lower canine retraction and loss of anchorage between conventional and self-ligating brackets: a single-center randomized split-mouth controlled trial. Clinical oral investigations. 2017;21(4):1047-53.
Dholakia KK, Bhat SR. Clinical efficiency of nonconventional elastomeric ligatures in the canine retraction phase of preadjusted edgewise appliance therapy: an in-vivo study. American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics. 2012;141(6):715-22.
Herman RJ, Currier GF, Miyake A. Mini-implant anchorage for maxillary canine retraction: a pilot study. American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics. 2006;130(2):228-35.
Miles PG. Self-ligating vs conventional twin brackets during en-masse space closure with sliding mechanics. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 2007;132(2):223-5.
Mezomo M, de Lima ES, de Menezes LM, Weissheimer A, Allgayer S. Maxillary canine retraction with self-ligating and conventional brackets: a randomized clinical trial. The Angle Orthodontist. 2011;81(2):292-7.
Wahab RMA, Idris H, Yacob H, Ariffin SHZ. Canine Retraction: A Randomised Clinical Trial Comparing Damon (TM) 3 Self-Ligating with Conventional Ligating Brackets. Sains Malays. 2013;42(2):251-5.
de Almeida MR, Herrero F, Fattal A, Davoody AR, Nanda R, Uribe F. A comparative anchorage control study between conventional and self-ligating bracket systems using differential moments. The Angle Orthodontist. 2013;83(6):937-42.
Hassan SE, Hajeer MY, Alali OH, Kaddah AS. The effect of using self-ligating brackets on maxillary canine retraction: a split-mouth design randomized controlled trial. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2016;17(6):496-503.
İndir
Yayınlanmış
Nasıl Atıf Yapılır
Sayı
Bölüm
Lisans
Telif Hakkı (c) 2023 EJONS INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL
Bu çalışma Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License ile lisanslanmıştır.
